Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Polyethylene wear is considered a threat to the long-term survival of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). This study aims to determine the linear penetration and volumetric wear associated with a non-congruent commonly used UKR, the St Georg Sled. This prosthesis has a biconvex femoral component which articulates with a flat polyethylene tibial component resulting in point contact. Components were retrieved from the knees of 19 patients undergoing revision for a failed UKR after primary replacement. Linear penetration and volumetric wear was measured using a coordinate measuring machine. Using an un-used implant, a three-dimensional computer model of the surface was generated and compared to the explanted specimen. Most patients had revisions because of disease progression to other compartments rather than specific wear related pathology. The mean linear wear for the sample was 0.89 mm (S.D. 0.59 mm) over an average period of 5.6 years giving the mean linear penetration rate of 0.15 mm/year. The mean volumetric wear was 99.7 mm3 (S.D. 79.3 mm3) over the same period giving a mean annual volumetric wear rate of 17.3 mm3/year. The results in this study indicate that clinically significant wear is not necessarily a feature of this fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. The pattern of wear is consistent with clinical findings and indicates excavation of the polyethylene after implantation but at a slower rate than would be anticipated.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.knee.2004.03.004

Type

Journal article

Journal

Knee

Publication Date

06/2004

Volume

11

Pages

177 - 181

Keywords

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Female, Humans, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Polyethylene, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Reoperation