Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish the feasibility of single-heartbeat 320-multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) and assess variables affecting image quality. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 249, 38% male) underwent CTCA. Two observers assessed image quality using a 4-point scale (1, excellent; 4, poor). RESULTS: Mean heart rate was 60 beats per minute (95% confidence interval, 59-62); body mass index, 29 kg/m (28-30); and dose-length product, 283 mGy·cm (266-301). During scanning, 133 (51%) received sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), 9 (4%) had ectopics, and 12 (5%) had atrial fibrillation. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 99% with mean image quality of 1.4 (1.3, 1.5). Age, sex, atrial fibrillation, ectopics, diabetes mellitus (12%), and obstructive disease were not related to image quality. A lower heart rate and GTN were associated with improved image quality (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal image quality in single-heartbeat 320-multidetector CTCA is achievable in 99% of unselected patients. Image quality is improved by lower heart rate and GTN.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/RCT.0000000000000044

Type

Journal article

Journal

J comput assist tomogr

Publication Date

2014

Volume

38

Pages

444 - 450

Keywords

Algorithms, Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease, Feasibility Studies, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Observer Variation, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity