Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In recognition of the benefits of transparent reporting, many peer-reviewed journals require that their authors be prepared to share their raw, unprocessed data with other scientists and/or state the availability of raw data in published articles. But little information on how data should be prepared for publication - or sharing - has emerged. In clinical research patient privacy and consent for use of personal health information are key considerations, but agreed-upon definitions of what constitutes anonymised patient information do not appear to have been established. We aim to address this issue by providing practical guidance for those involved in the publication process, by proposing a minimum standard for de-identifying datasets for the purposes of publication in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal, or sharing with other researchers. Basic advice on file preparation is provided along with procedural guidance on prospective and retrospective publication of raw data, with an emphasis on randomised controlled trials.

Original publication

DOI

10.1186/1745-6215-11-9

Type

Journal article

Journal

Trials

Publication Date

29/01/2010

Volume

11

Addresses

BioMed Central, 236 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL, UK. iain.hrynaszkiewicz@biomedcentral.com

Keywords

Humans, Peer Review, Research, Confidentiality, Access to Information, Informed Consent, Copyright, Authorship, Editorial Policies, Periodicals as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Guidelines as Topic