Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Nebulized lung surfactant therapy has been a neonatology long-pursued goal. Nevertheless, many clinical trials have yet to show a clear clinical efficacy of nebulized surfactant, which, in part, is due to the technical challenges of delivering aerosols to the lungs of preterm neonates. The study aimed to test microbubbles for improving lung deposition in preterm neonates. An in vitro testing method was developed to replicate the clinical environment; it used a 3D-printed preterm neonate model, connected to a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and a vibrating mesh nebulizer. The flow rate of the HFNC mirrored that used in the clinics (i.e., 4, 6, and 8 L/min). Followingly, the lung penetrations of aerosols with and without microbubbles were compared. The aerodynamic diameter of aerosols with microbubbles (MMAD=1.75 μm) was lower than that of the counterpart (MMAD=2.25 μm). Microbubble-laden aerosols had a significantly higher number of microbubbles that were below 1.0 μm. Microbubble-laden aerosols had dramatically higher lung penetration in the preterm model; lung penetration efficiencies were 30.0, 25.5, and 17.5 % at 4, 6, and 8 L/min, respectively, whereas the lung penetration efficiency for conventionally nebulized aerosols was below 1.25 % in the three flow rates.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124772

Type

Journal article

Journal

Int j pharm

Publication Date

27/09/2024

Volume

666

Keywords

Lung delivery, Lung surfactant therapy, Microbubbles, Preterm, nRDS