Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

An extensive and growing number of reviews of the published literature demonstrate that health research publications have frequent deficiencies. Of particular concern are poor reports of randomised trials, which make it difficult or impossible for readers to assess how the research was conducted, to evaluate the reliability of the findings, or to place them in the context of existing research evidence. As a result, published reports of trials often cannot be used by clinicians to inform patient care or to inform public health policy, and the data cannot be included in systematic reviews. Reporting guidelines are designed to identify the key information that researchers should include in a report of their research. We describe the history of reporting guidelines for randomised trials culminating in the CONSORT Statement in 1996. We detail the subsequent development and extension of CONSORT and consider related initiatives aimed at improving the reliability of the medical research literature.

Original publication

DOI

10.1002/sim.5402

Type

Journal article

Journal

Statistics in medicine

Publication Date

11/2012

Volume

31

Pages

2985 - 2997

Addresses

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Wolfson College, Linton Road, Oxford, U.K. doug.altman@csm.ox.ac.uk

Keywords

Registries, Consensus, Algorithms, Publication Bias, Guideline Adherence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Guidelines as Topic, Checklist, Research Report, Quality Improvement