Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Induction of labour at 39 weeks for nulliparous women aged 35 years and over may prevent stillbirths and does not increase caesarean births, so it may be popular. But the overall costs and benefits of such a policy have not been compared.A cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (the 35/39 trial).Obstetric departments of 38 UK National Health Service hospitals and one UK primary-care trust.Nulliparous women aged 35 years or over on their expected due date, with a singleton live fetus in a cephalic presentation.Costs were estimated from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on patient responses to the EQ-5D at baseline and 4 weeks.Data on antenatal care, mode of delivery, analgesia in labour, method of induction, EQ-5D (baseline and 4 weeks postnatal) and participant-administered postnatal health resource use data were collected.The intervention was associated with a mean cost saving of £263 and a small additional gain in QALYs (though this was not statistically significant), even without considering any possible QALY gains from stillbirth prevention.A policy of induction of labour at 39 weeks for women of advanced maternal age would save money.A policy of induction of labour at 39 weeks of gestation for women of advanced maternal age would save money.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/1471-0528.14557

Type

Journal article

Journal

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

Publication Date

05/2017

Volume

124

Pages

929 - 934

Addresses

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.