Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Systematic Reviews should assist neurologists in making informed treatment choices. Health operators require a summary of the evidence in terms of its quality and relevance as well as information about the potential benefits and harms for a particular individual. The workshop, particularly oriented to clinical neurologists, will introduce the basic principles of understanding a systematic review, making sure that the rationale for everything is explained. The emphasis will be on statistical issues but this be interpreted very broadly. Thus, many issues will be addressed, including the need to specify review methodology, aspects of searching the literature, data extraction and quality assessment of primary studies. The basic principles of statistical alalysis (meta-analysis) will be introduced (with minimal mathematics) together with some discussion of areas which cause particular difficulty. The second part will consider some practical aspects of trying to implement the procedures discussed in the first part, such as problems of data extraction and difficulties of working out the design of the study. Finally, various aspects of the interpretation of systematic reviews will be discussed. All topics will be illustrated with real neurological examples.


Journal article


Neurological sciences

Publication Date