An interactive image analysis package was developed to examine whole cross-sections from the femoral neck. The package quantifies cortical width (Ct.Wi), cortical porosity (Ct.Po), and proportions of cortical, cancellous bone as a percentage of bone plus marrow area. Segmental analysis was used to quantify circumferential variations in bone distribution within the femoral cross-section. To evaluate reproducibility of data four independent operators analyzed previously prepared femoral neck sections from a 2000 BC population. Differences in total and circumferential distributions of cortical and cancellous bone with respect to gender and age of samples were demonstrated. Reproducibility was assessed using coefficients of variation (CV). Analysis of sections using a variable magnification, giving largest possible image size, rather than a set magnification reduced variation between operators for all measurements. Use of a calculated threshold significantly decreased variation between operators for the proportions of cortical and cancellous bone (p < or = 0.026). Dividing the image into 8 rather than 16 segments also improved reproducibility. There was little agreement between operators in the determination of cortical porosity. The mean CV for the other quantitative indices such as cortical width and proportions of cortical and cancellous bone ranged from 4.87% to 13.52%. The genders showed similar patterns in circumferential distribution of bone. Cortical width was significantly greater in the inferior region compared to the other areas, whereas percent cortical bone was lowest at the superior region. The center of mass (COM) for the younger age group was located anteriorly, whereas in the older samples the COM was located posteriorly of the center of area (p = 0.041). Basic data relating to cortical and cancellous bone of acceptable reproducibility in comparison with current standards in iliac histomorphometry can now be provided at modest cost in operator time and resources.
\n \n\n \n \nOsteoporosis is reported to be rare in Black Africa. The low fracture incidence among North American black women is explained by a high peak bone mass and preservation of bone mineral into old age. To assess whether this is the case among Black African women, we measured bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), using single- and dual-photon absorptiometry, in 195 rural Gambian women aged over 44 years and 391 white women of comparable age from three centers in the U.K. Measurements were made at the midshaft of the radius, distal radius, lumbar spine, and femoral neck. The influence of height, weight, and nationality on BMC and BMD was analyzed. BMC and BMD decreased with age at all sites. Age, decreasing weight, but not height were independently associated with lower BMC at all sites. BMC in Gambian women was lower than in British women by 31% at the lumbar spine and 16% at the midshaft of the radius. After adjustment for age, height, and weight, BMC among Gambian women remained 24% lower at the lumbar spine and 10% lower at the radius. In women aged over 64 years, BMC at the lumbar spine was 42% lower and BMD was 31% lower in The Gambia (for all comparisons, p < 0.005). We conclude that bone mineral mass is not preserved in elderly Gambian women. However, minimal trauma fractures are rare in this population. These results challenge the concept of BMC as a primary determinant of fracture risk.
\n \n\n \n \nWe previously showed that it is possible to cross-calibrate peripheral bone densitometers using the European Spine Phantom (ESP). We have now performed a multinational study of cross-calibrated radius bone density based on normal subjects of both sexes in eight European centers. Six centers were equipped with machines made by Scanco or Stratec for determining distal radial trabecular bone density by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and two were equipped with Lunar SP2 single photon absorptiometry (SPA) equipment for measuring midshaft cortical bone density. Subjects recruited ranged from 20 to over 80 years of age. Over one hundred and fifteen men were studied by QCT and a different cohort of 104 men were studied with SPA; the equivalent figures for women were 235 and 123. Reference ranges were derived for bone density against age for each of the four groups, and their applicability is discussed in relation to between-center differences in the results obtained. There were insignificant differences (P > 0.05 with Bonferroni correction) between centers in the values obtained by QCT in the different populations. However, there were considerably larger and highly statistically significant differences between midshaft cortical bone density values of about 10% of overall means between subjects from eastern Finland and central Belgium (P < 0.001), with higher Finnish values. Women had considerably lower radial trabecular bone density values than men at all ages, a result that differentiates the radius from the spine. This sex difference widened after menopause. These results have important implications for understanding the contribution of bone density to the differential risk of Colles' fracture in the two sexes and suggest that further work is needed to establish young normal reference ranges for radial bone density in Europe.
\n \n\n \n \nBone density measurements by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine can now be made precisely, but there is no uniformity in reporting results and in presenting reference data. A European Union Concerted Action therefore devised a uniform procedure for cross-calibrating and standardizing instruments, using the European spine phantom (ESP) prototype. This phantom differs in a number of respects from the final version of the ESP. Eighteen centers in nine countries obtained 1619 records (1035 women) from Caucasian subjects, aged 20-80 years, drawn from normal populations. The DXA machines used were made by the Hologic, Lunar, and Norland companies. Highly statistically significant differences were evident between populations, both in apparent rates of bone loss with age and in the spread of values about the age-adjusted means. There were small residual differences in the results obtained with the three machine brands which could have been due to the relatively large between-center population differences we observed. The alternative or additional explanation that they were attributable, in part, to the design differences between the ESP prototype and the definitive ESP, which became available after this study was completed, was shown to be a valid possibility. Results from postmenopausal women reported in relation to the years that have elapsed since menopause showed reduced population variance when compared with conventional reporting in relation to age. After cross-calibration, the center with the highest age-adjusted normal density value averaged 23% more than the center with the lowest. It is therefore crucially important to select appropriate reference data in clinical and epidemiological studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
\n \n\n \n \nThe main objective of this study was to describe longitudinal patterns of spinal bone loss in normal women who undergo a natural menopause. The second objective was to determine if a proportion of women suffer excessively rapid postmenopausal bone loss from the spine. If this was the case it was the aim to devise a means of predicting the woman at excess risk; but if all women lost bone at similar rates, the aim was to document changing loss rates over the first 5-8 postmenopausal years. Responding women in six suburban general practices recalled for cervical smears who had their last menstrual period 9- 36 months previously were invited to participate in a longitudinal study of bone loss and the biochemical markers plasma osteocalcin and urinary hydroxyproline. Sixty-four subjects agreed to participate, a response rate of 80%. In the ensuing 5 years, six received hormone replacement therapy and are not reported on. The main outcome measures were rates of spinal bone loss over 5 years, measured by dual photon absorptiometry, and radial bone loss over the first 2 years measured to quantitative computed tomography. Spinal bone loss was similar between individuals, with 94% of the variability in the data being accounted for by a statistical model that assumed parallel rates of bone loss. A less restrictive model allowing women to have different rates of spinal bone loss accounted for 12% more of the remaining variance in the data than the previous model. However, rates of radial bone loss were more dissimilar between women than rates of spinal loss. The results of the biochemical data collected serially showed that the plasma osteocalcin rose slowly to a plateau at 5 years postmenopause; in contrast, the hydroxyproline fell progressively with time over the whole period of study. These results were interpreted as being consistent with diminishing rates of bone destruction which gradually reequilibrated with bone formation as time passed after menopause.
\n \n\n \n \nThe lack of standardization in bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine and other skeletal sites is generally recognized as an important and unresolved issue. We report and discuss efforts at standardization and cross-calibration of DXA and QCT equipment. We have designed and tested a geometrically defined, semi-anthropomorphic phantom, the European Spine Phantom (ESP). It contains a spine insert consisting of three vertebrae of increasing bone mineral densities and thicknesses of cortical structures; the respective parameters are given in tabular form for the final phantom design. Results for cross-calibration with the ESP compare well with patient results. Measurements on the first 30 phantoms confirmed that the ESP can be manufactured with a variation of about 1%. We conclude that the ESP is suitable for daily quality assurance, cross-calibration of instruments and universal standardization. The ESP was used to establish standardized BMD (sBMD) units for DXA equipment going into effect in late 1995. Its acceptance by manufacturers as a calibration standard for DXA and QCT measurements appears imminent.
\n \n\n \n \nUp to now it has not been possible to reliably cross-calibrate dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) densitometry equipment made by different manufacturers so that a measurement made on an individual subject can be expressed in the units used with a different type of machine. Manufacturers have adopted various procedures for edge detection and calibration, producing various normal ranges which are specific to each individual manufacturer's brand of machine. In this study we have used the recently described European Spine Phantom (ESP, prototype version), which contains three semi-anthropomorphic \"vertebrae\" of different densities made of stimulated cortical and trabecular bone, to calibrate a range of DXA densitometers and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) equipment used in the measurement of trabecular bone density of the lumbar vertebrae. Three brands of QCT equipment and three brands of DXA equipment were assessed. Repeat measurements were made to assess machine stability. With the large majority of machines which proved stable, mean values were obtained for the measured low, medium and high density vertebrae respectively. In the case of the QCT equipment these means were for the trabecular bone density, and in the case of the DXA equipment for vertebral body bone density in the posteroanterior projection. All DXA machines overestimated the projected area of the vertebral bodies by incorporating variable amounts of transverse process. In general, the QCT equipment gave measured values which were close to the specified values for trabecular density, but there were substantial differences from the specified values in the results provided by the three DXA brands. For the QCT and Norland DXA machines (posteroanterior view), the relationships between specified densities and observed densities were found to be linear, whereas for the other DXA equipment (posteroanterior view), slightly curvilinear, exponential fits were found to be necessary to fit the plots of observed versus specified densities. From these plots, individual calibration equations were derived for each machine studied. For optimal cross-calibration, it was found to be necessary to use an individual calibration equation for each machine. This study has shown that it is possible to cross-calibrate DXA as well as QCT equipment for the measurement of axial bone density. This will be of considerable benefit for large-scale epidemiological studies as well as for multi-site clinical studies depending on bone densitometry.
\n \n\n \n \nMeasurements of the proximal femur by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are assuming increasing importance in clinical and epidemiological studies. However, different DXA manufacturers have adopted varying approaches to measuring the femoral neck and trochanter regions with the result that there is as yet no agreement on normal ranges and how to cross-calibrate between different machines. In this Concerted Action (of the EU's 2nd Framework Programme), 12 clinical centers in eight countries recruited a total of 855 female and 517 male Caucasian subjects who were judged to be free of conditions known to cause secondary osteoporosis and who had not been treated with drugs known to affect bone mass. The DXA machines used were made by Hologic, Lunar, and Norland. Each machine was cross-calibrated with the European Spine Phantom prototype designed by Kalender. All femoral neck and trochanter results were expressed as standardized values and were first examined for possible bias due to between-brand differences in choice of areas for measurement. On average, trochanter areas were similar between brands but Norland chose a narrower neck region for analysis. Bone mineral density (BMA or BMD g/cm2) was log-normally distributed for all groups at the femoral neck but normally distributed at the trochanter in men and postmenopausal women. There were substantial between-center differences after cross-calibration in age-adjusted mean values at both sites and also in the rates of apparent bone loss with age and the amounts of scatter within populations about mean age-adjusted values. With the proviso that locally derived normal ranges would allow more accurate comparisons for clinical purposes, European normal ranges were derived for both neck and trochanter. Data obtained with the three individual brands of machine fitted these overall ranges well. Bone loss was apparent in premenopausal women at the femoral neck but not the trochanter. Postmenopausal women's data was somewhat better fitted by reference to years since menopause than to chronological age. This work provides a basis for conducting future epidemiological and clinical studies with more than one brand of machine as long as each individual subject, if measured consecutively, is measured on the same machine throughout.
\n \n\n \n \nPatients with vertebral osteoporosis have a wide range of bone loss rates, bone remodelling rates and capacities for gastrointestinal (GI) calcium absorption. To test the hypothesis that variations in GI absorptive capacity determine rates of bone loss or remodelling, we have sought relationships between calcium absorption or vitamin D metabolite levels on the one hand and rates of cancellous and cortical bone loss (measured by serial quantitative computed tomography in the radius; n = 25) or indices of bone remodelling in tetracycline-prelabelled transiliac biopsies (n = 41) on the other, in a sequential untreated group. Calcium absorption (net and true) was measured in 18-day balances and by a two-isotope deconvolution method (fractional absorption and maximum absorption rate, MAR). There was no significant seasonal effect on any of these four measures of calcium absorption (variance ratio, F = 0.52-1.61, p > 0.1) or on 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (F = 0.13, p > 0.1; range 11-69 pg/ml), notwithstanding the expected seasonal effect on 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (mean 18.7 ng/ml, zenith mid July, semi-amplitude 7.5 ng/ml; F = 6.82, p < 0.01). Neither this metabolite nor 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D correlated with any index of calcium absorption (p > 0.1). No measure of calcium absorption (or intake) had a significant relationship with radial cortical or cancellous bone loss (p all > 0.1) but cancellous bone loss was associated with the rate of endogenous calcium excretion (r = 0.50, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
\n \n\n \n \n