Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Identifying individuals who are at increased risk of mortality or major morbidity following surgical procedures is an important challenge in patient management. Multivariable risk prediction models (e.g., EuroSCORE, POSSUM, and the STS Risk Calculator) have been developed to help surgeons calculate a patient’s risk of mortality using a combination of risk factors. These prediction models have transformed preoperative risk assessment. Studies evaluating the performance of risk prediction models in this and other areas of medicine have, however, been characterized by poor design, methodological conduct, and reporting. We discuss the main methodological considerations behind risk prediction models and critically discuss issues in their design, validation, and transparency.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s40140-016-0171-8

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Publication Date

2016-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Keywords

calibration, risk prediction, multivariable, discrimination, statistical methods