Double hit ultra-high risk myeloma treated with isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide (Isa-VRDc) induction and isa-VRD consolidation: Initial results of the UK myeloma research alliance (UKMRA) RADAR trial in newly diagnosed transplant eligible patients
Ramasamy K., Royle K-L., Cicero R., de Tute R., Jenner M., Bygrave C., Popat R., Mehta D., Chiecchio L., Balik B., Kazeroun M., Pratt G., Olivier C., Barnard L., Jackson S., Kennaway C., Cook G., Chant A., Meads D., Dawkins B., Chapman M., Jackson G., Chantry A., Kaiser M., Sive J., Gooding S., Boyle E., Parrish C., Smith D., Chan YLT., Owen R., Cairns D., Yong K.
Abstract Background: Clinical outcomes in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) patients continue to improve, which highlight the persistent unmet need in patients with genetically high-risk disease. Recently published IMS/IMWG high risk criteria confirms poor outcomes in double-hit [2 high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA)] disease in comparison to patients with single HRCA (Avet-Loiseau JCO 2025). RADAR aimed to evaluate Isa-VRDc induction followed by single autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), Isa-VRD consolidation and IsaR maintenance, in patients with ultra-high-risk disease. Study design/ Methods: UK-MRA RADAR is a prospective, national, multi-centre, risk-adapted, response-guided multi-arm, multi-stage (MAMS) phase II/III trial which aims to recruit 1400 patients with NDMM eligible for ASCT. Participants enter a high-risk pathway based on the presence of ≥2 HRCA (t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14:20), del(17p), del1p and gain(1q)) defined by standard-of-care cytogenetic (FISH/MLPA) testing. Participants with high-risk disease in v4 of the protocol (HRv4) received 4 x 21 day cycles of Isa-VRDc (Isa: Weekly C2, D1 and D8 C3, D1 and D15 C4; V: Weekly; R:D1-14; D:Weekly; c: D1 and D8). Participants received an ASCT followed by 4 x 21 day cycles of Isa-VRD consolidation (Isa: Weekly C1, D1 and D8 C2, D1 and D15 C3+; V: Weekly; R:D1-14; D:Weekly) and 28 day cycles of IsaR maintenance (Isa: Weekly C1, D1 and D15 C2; R: D1 – D21) until progression. Flow MRD testing (sensitivity 10-5) was done post-induction, post-transplant and 3, 6,12 and 18 months after starting consolidation. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 18 months. HRv4 followed a Sargent three-outcome phase II design. It was designed to test the null hypothesis (Ho) that the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 18 months post-registration was ≤65.9% (based on data from Myeloma XI) against the alternative hypothesis of ≥81.7% (OPTIMUM, Kaiser Blood 2021). 70 patients were required for at least 80% power, testing at the 1-sided maximum 5% significance level with a 5% drop-out rate. Results: 70 participants were registered to HRv4 between 1Sept22 and 4Sept23. Median age was 60 yrs (range, 40-74). 84.3% of individuals were of white ethnicity. R-ISS staging proportions at diagnosis I/II/III/missing was 18.6%/67.1%/10.0%/4.3% respectively. All participants had 2 HRCA and 8/70 had ≥3 HRCA. Median follow up was 24 months (IQR, 21-26). 69/70 participants started induction treatment. 68/69 completed all four cycles. Adequate stem cell harvest was obtained in all eligible patients (62/68), and 61 proceeded to ASCT. 56 participants commenced post-ASCT treatment. Dose delivery was as per the protocol in >90% of all treatment cycles across the entire treatment pathway (induction, consolidation and maintenance). 67/70 participants were evaluable for primary endpoint. The cut-offs for the three-outcome design were: Red (do not reject Ho) ≤47 / 67, Amber (neither accept or reject Ho) 48 - 51 / 67, Green (reject Ho) ≥52 / 67. In total 59/67 participants were alive and progression-free at 18 months (88.1% (95%CI: 77.8-94.7)). ≥VGPR rates increased from 82.9% post induction to 87.5% post-transplant and were 96.2% and 85.7% at 6 and 12 months after starting consolidation. MRD negativity was 26.2% post-induction, 69.5% post-transplant and 69.6% and 59.5% at 6 and 12 months after starting consolidation. Of MRD negative participants post-ASCT with a sample available, 66.7% remained MRD negative 12 months after starting consolidation. A grade 3-4 adverse reaction was reported in 63.8% of participants. No treatment-related deaths have been reported. 47/69 (68.1%) participants had an SAE. Infections were the commonest SAE; 36/85 (42.4%) with 31/36 ≥G3 (86.1%).Conclusions: RADAR HRv4 pathway is the largest analysis of ultra-high risk (double hit) patients reported to date. All participants meet the new IMS/IMWG HR criteria. Isa-VRDc induction, followed by Isa-VRD consolidation post-ASCT and IsaR maintenance met the primary endpoint, with the study crossing the Green design threshold, with 88% (59/67) alive and progression-free at 18 months. These results compare favourably to the TE NDMM GMMG HD-7 trial which included standard and high-risk patients, and high-risk CONCEPT and OPTIMUM NDMM trials with extended consolidation