Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract Aims Excess weight increases morbidity risk after colorectal cancer surgery. Pre-operative weight loss may reduce morbidity. We tested the feasibility of a weight loss intervention. Methods Adults with BMI≥28kg/m2 awaiting curative elective colorectal cancer resection from 9 centres across England were randomised 1:1 to receive usual care or dietetic support with a low-energy (800kcal/day, 76g protein/day) total diet replacement programme between decision to treat and surgery (ISRCTN39207707, prospectively registered). Progression criteria to a definitive trial included recruitment (≥72 patients), engagement (≥75% of dietetic phone calls attended), adherence (≥60% of intervention participants achieving ≥5% weight loss), and retention (≥85% at 30 days post-operatively). Secondary outcomes included changes in weight and fat-free mass. Results Between 27/03/2023-13/08/2024, seventy-five participants were randomised and 71 eligible participants undergoing surgery (n=36 intervention, n=35 usual care) were analysed [61% male, mean (SD) 64 (8.7) years, baseline BMI 35.4 (5.3) kg/m2, 87% with ASA score 2-3]. Participants attended 85% of their dietetic calls. The median (IQR) period from randomisation to surgery was 33 (25-43) days, during which 61% and 9% of intervention and usual care participants lost ≥5% of their weight, respectively [OR: 16.8 (95%CI: 4.3-65.3)]. Intervention participants lost 6.1kg (3.0) until surgery, which was an additional 4.3kg (95%CI: -5.8, -2.7) compared with usual care. Between-group adjusted change in fat-free mass was 0.1kg (95%CI: -3.9, 4.0). There were no intervention-related serious adverse events. Retention at 30 days post-operatively was 100%. Discussion The intervention was feasible without safety concerns meeting the progression criteria for a definitive trial.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1093/bjs/znaf166.085

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

2025-08-28T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

112