Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Atrial fibrillation is a common complication of cardiac surgery. Multiple models exist to estimate the risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) and improve targeting of preventative measures, yet none have been consistently adopted into clinical use. This study performed a comprehensive systematic review, assessing quality and risk of bias of studies describing the development or external validation of AFACS prediction models. Although some models performed well in development and external validation (median C-statistic for apparent validation alone, 0.71; range, 0.60 to 0.98; external validation, 0.61; range, 0.51 to 0.77), all model analyses were rated at high risk of bias. Common causes for this were small sample size, data-driven predictor selection, and inadequate internal validation. Overall, no individual model could be recommended for clinical use given the methodologic limitations identified, emphasizing the need for improvements in future AFACS prediction models to facilitate improved targeting of prophylaxis.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1097/ALN.0000000000005665

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

143

Pages

1643 - 1655

Total pages

12

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Assessment