Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

There is a North Atlantic divide, with cementless femoral stems being used more frequently in the USA and cemented stems being used more frequently in many countries in Europe. This is primarily because different cemented stems have been used on different sides of the Atlantic and the results of the cemented stems in the US have often been poor, whereas the results of the stems used in Europe have been good. In the National registers in Europe, cemented stems have tended to achieve better results than cementless.

Original publication




Journal article


Bone joint j

Publication Date





51 - 52


Cemented stem, Cementless stem, Exeter, NJR, RSA, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Bone Cements, Cementation, Europe, Femur, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prosthesis Design, Registries, United States