Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The best approach to use when performing THA is controversial. We did a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study of 1089 THAs to evaluate patient-centered hip scores and dislocation and revision rates when comparing anterolateral and posterior hip approaches at 5 years' followup. Patients were divided into two groups depending on which surgical approach was used: anterolateral or posterior. The primary outcome measure was change in Oxford hip score. At 5 years, there were no differences in change in Oxford hip score and in dislocation or revision rates between the groups.Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s11999-008-0560-5

Type

Journal article

Journal

Clinical orthopaedics and related research

Publication Date

02/2009

Volume

467

Pages

473 - 477

Addresses

Botnar 2 Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Treatment Outcome, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Reoperation, Prospective Studies, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male