Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Search results (686)

« Back to Publications

ssessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Beard DJ. et al, (2026), Lancet Rheumatol, 8, e116 - e126

voiding routine gastric residual volume measurement in neonatal critical care (the neoGASTRIC trial): study protocol for a multi-centre, unblinded, randomised, controlled trial.

Nuthall E. et al, (2026), Trials, 27

Comparison of the Outcomes of Simultaneous Bilateral and Unilateral Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man.

Mohammad HR. et al, (2026), JB JS Open Access, 11

ssessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Beard D. et al, (2025), Lancet Rheumatology

The Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction Study for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): lessons learnt from an internal pilot trial.

Pandit H. et al, (2025), Health Technol Assess, 29, 1 - 29

Knee arthroplasty compared with joint distraction for osteoarthritis: a phase III randomized controlled trial.

Hamilton TW. et al, (2025), Bone Jt Open, 6, 886 - 893

Knee arthroplasty versus knee joint distraction for osteoarthritis: a Phase III randomised controlled trial

Hamilton TW. et al, (2025), Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 33

Knee arthroplasty versus knee joint distraction for osteoarthritis: a phase III randomised controlled trial

Hamilton T. et al, (2025), Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 33

Mid-term outcomes of the fixed-bearing lateral Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Arthur LW. et al, (2025), Bone Joint J, 107-B, 432 - 439

Finite element analysis and experimental verification of press-fit peg push-in and pull-out in trabecular bone analogue

Min X. et al, (2025), Results in engineering, 25

Machine learning is better than surgeons at assessing unicompartmental knee replacement radiographs.

Tu SJ. et al, (2025), Knee, 52, 212 - 219

Surgical factors that contribute to tibial periprosthetic fracture after cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: a finite element analysis.

Min X. et al, (2025), Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 13

Matched Comparison of Implant and Functional Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: A Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man and the Hospital Episode Statistics Patient Reported Outcome Measures Database.

Mohammad HR. et al, (2024), J Bone Joint Surg Am, 106, 1553 - 1562

Using orthopaedic health care resources efficiently: A cost analysis of day surgery for unicompartmental knee replacement.

Hlatshwako TG. et al, (2024), Knee, 49, 147 - 157

Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Cemented and Cementless Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.

Mohammad HR. et al, (2024), J Arthroplasty, 39, 2007 - 2013

Load More

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
»