Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Search results (445)

« Back to Publications

Surgery for early structural osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: the SCORE evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.

Price A. et al, (2026), Health Technol Assess, 30, 1 - 150

Step count recovery patterns in the first six weeks after knee replacement in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study using wrist-worn accelerometry.

Olanrewaju AE. et al, (2026), Rheumatol Int, 46

Long-term risk of knee replacement after ACL reconstruction using the contralateral knee as an internal control: a National Hospital Episode Statistics database study of 135 881 patients.

Hennessy C. et al, (2026), Br J Sports Med

Comparable reinfection rates between one‐stage and two‐stage revision total knee arthroplasty with gastrocnemius flap reconstruction for periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sina J. et al, (2026), Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 13

Ten Year Follow-up of a randomized Trial of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Alternative Forms of Surgical Cartilage Management in in the Knee.

Snow M. et al, (2026), Osteoarthritis Cartilage

Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Beard DJ. et al, (2026), Lancet Rheumatol, 8, e116 - e126

Translational Potential of an Electrospun Polycaprolactone Scaffold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Lin J. et al, (2026), Adv Fiber Mater, 8, 560 - 576

Evaluating the impact of revision knee arthroplasty networks in England: an analysis of temporal trends in referral patterns, surgical volumes and early outcomes using hospital episode statistics data for England between 2012 and 2024.

Matthews AH. et al, (2026), Knee, 58

The one-year trajectories of patient-reported outcomes are better for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty : a matched cohort study.

Elkjær Christensen AL. et al, (2025), Bone Jt Open, 6, 1588 - 1597

What factors are important to patients when considering a revision total knee replacement in a network model of care? An exploratory qualitative analysis.

Matthews AH. et al, (2025), BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 27

Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Beard D. et al, (2025), Lancet Rheumatology, 8, e116 - e126

The MEniscal TeaR Outcome (METRO) study : a prospective cohort study exploring the factors that affect outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for a meniscal tear.

Ahmed I. et al, (2025), Bone Joint J, 107-B, 1189 - 1195

The risk of early revision after trainee led primary unicompartmental and total knee replacement.

Howgate DJ. et al, (2025), Knee, 56, 449 - 458

The effect of minimum volume recommendations on surgeon activity for first revision total knee replacement: an analysis of 2009-2019 United Kingdom National Joint Registry data.

Matthews AH. et al, (2025), Knee, 56, 150 - 158

PainDETECT as a Potential Tool for Personalized Medicine: Predicting Outcome One Year After Knee Arthroplasty.

Wall AJW. et al, (2025), Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes, 9

Load More

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
»