Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning.
Journal article
Collins GS. et al, (2023), J clin epidemiol, 165
Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations.
Journal article
Logullo P. et al, (2023), Bmj evid based med
Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations.
Journal article
Schlussel MM. et al, (2023), J clin epidemiol, 159, 246 - 256
Completeness of Reporting in Diet- and Nutrition-Related Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analysis: Protocol for 2 Independent Meta-Research Studies.
Journal article
Silva F. et al, (2023), Jmir res protoc, 12
Protocol for a meta-research study of protocols for diet or nutrition-related trials published in indexed journals: general aspects of study design, rationale and reporting limitations.
Journal article
Silva FM. et al, (2022), Bmj open, 12
What facilitators and barriers might researchers encounter when using reporting guidelines? Part 1: A thematic synthesis
Preprint
Harwood J. et al, (2022)
An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials.
Journal article
Hopewell S. et al, (2022), Nat med
GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines.
Journal article
Struthers C. et al, (2021), Bmc med res methodol, 21
Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use.
Journal article
Logullo P. et al, (2020), J glob health, 10
Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review.
Journal article
Kempf E. et al, (2018), Br j cancer, 119, 1288 - 1296
Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops.
Journal article
Sufi S. et al, (2018), Plos comput biol, 14
Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research.
Journal article
MacCarthy A. et al, (2018), Br j cancer, 118, 619 - 628
Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor and biomarker studies in medical oncology.
Conference paper
Kempf E. et al, (2017), Journal of clinical oncology, 35, e14023 - e14023
Methods for Evaluating Medical Tests and Biomarkers
Journal article
Gopalakrishna G. et al, (2017), Diagnostic and prognostic research, 1
Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology
Conference paper
Kempf E. et al, (2016), European journal of cancer, 69, S64 - S64
Risk prediction models in perioperative medicine: methodological considerations
Journal article
Collins GS. et al, (2016), Current anesthesiology reports