Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

Describing the landscape of nutrition- and diet-related randomized controlled trials: metaresearch study of protocols published between 2012 and 2022.

Silva FM. et al, (2025), Am j clin nutr, 121, 882 - 891

There is no reliable evidence that providing authors with customized article templates including items from reporting guidelines improves completeness of reporting: the GoodReports randomized trial (GRReaT).

Struthers C. et al, (2025), Bmc med res methodol, 25

Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations.

Logullo P. et al, (2024), Bmj evid based med, 29, 223 - 228

Methods used to develop the SPIRIT 2024 and CONSORT 2024 Statements.

Tunn R. et al, (2024), J clin epidemiol, 169

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning.

Collins GS. et al, (2024), J clin epidemiol, 165

Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations.

Schlussel MM. et al, (2023), J clin epidemiol, 159, 246 - 256

Completeness of Reporting in Diet- and Nutrition-Related Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analysis: Protocol for 2 Independent Meta-Research Studies.

Silva F. et al, (2023), Jmir res protoc, 12

Protocol for a meta-research study of protocols for diet or nutrition-related trials published in indexed journals: general aspects of study design, rationale and reporting limitations.

Silva FM. et al, (2022), Bmj open, 12

What facilitators and barriers might researchers encounter when using reporting guidelines? Part 1: A thematic synthesis

Harwood J. et al, (2022)

Completeness of Reporting in Diet- and Nutrition-Related Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analysis: Protocol for 2 Independent Meta-Research Studies (Preprint)

Silva F. et al, (2022)

An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials.

Hopewell S. et al, (2022), Nat med

GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines.

Struthers C. et al, (2021), Bmc med res methodol, 21

Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use.

Logullo P. et al, (2020), J glob health, 10

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review.

Kempf E. et al, (2018), Br j cancer, 119, 1288 - 1296

Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops.

Sufi S. et al, (2018), Plos comput biol, 14

Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research.

MacCarthy A. et al, (2018), Br j cancer, 118, 619 - 628

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor and biomarker studies in medical oncology.

Kempf E. et al, (2017), Journal of clinical oncology, 35, e14023 - e14023

Methods for Evaluating Medical Tests and Biomarkers

Gopalakrishna G. et al, (2017), Diagnostic and prognostic research, 1

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology

Kempf E. et al, (2016), European journal of cancer, 69, S64 - S64

Risk prediction models in perioperative medicine: methodological considerations

Collins GS. et al, (2016), Current anesthesiology reports

Include forthcoming?