Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported pain scores and assess the influence of neuropathy and co-morbidity, on knee pain following cemented and cementless medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) 5 years after surgery. METHOD: In this longitudinal study, 262 cemented and 262 cementless Oxford UKR performed for the same indications and with the same techniques were recruited. Patients were reviewed at five years, evaluating patient-reported pain and association with clinical outcomes. Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP), PainDETECT (PD), Charnley score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS) were compared. RESULTS: In both cohorts, intermittent pain was more common than constant pain (47% vs 21%). Cementless knees reported significantly less pain than cemented (ICOAP-Total 5/100 vs 11/100, p 

Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s00167-023-07589-4

Type

Journal article

Journal

Knee surg sports traumatol arthrosc

Publication Date

11/2023

Volume

31

Pages

5180 - 5189

Keywords

Arthroplasty, Cemented, Cementless, Knee, Knee replacement, Pain, Patient-reported outcome measures, Replacement, Unicompartmental, Humans, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Knee Prosthesis, Longitudinal Studies, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain, Morbidity, Treatment Outcome, Reoperation