Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: We provide an initial description and validation of some public domain patient-reported outcome (PRO) items to assess cancer symptom burden to address immediate barriers to symptom assessment use in clinical practice and facilitate future research. METHODS: We created the Open Symptom Framework (OSF), a flexible tool for clinical cancer-related symptom assessment. The items comprise six components: recall period, concept, symptom, qualifier(s), a definition, and a 5-point Likert-type response. We recruited patients receiving cancer therapy in the United States and United Kingdom. We assessed external construct validity by comparing OSF scores to the PRO-CTCAE measure and assessed reliability, scalability, dimensionality, and item ordering within a non-parametric item response theory framework. We tested differential item functioning for country, age, gender, and level of education. RESULTS: We developed a framework alongside clinical and psychometric experts and debrieifed with 10 patients. For validation, we recruited 331patients. All items correlated with the PRO-CTCAE equivalents (r = 0.55-0.96, all p 

Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s11136-024-03656-6

Type

Journal article

Journal

Qual life res

Publication Date

09/2024

Volume

33

Pages

2349 - 2358

Keywords

Item response theory, Open symptom framework, Patient-reported outcome measure, Patient-reported outcome version of common terminology criteria for adverse events, Humans, Neoplasms, Male, Female, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, United Kingdom, Reproducibility of Results, Aged, United States, Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Symptom Assessment, Quality of Life