Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Deep surgical site infections (SSI's) complicate Gustilo IIIB tibial fractures in 8-13% of cases. Antibiotic prophylaxis typically covers environmental contaminants. However, nosocomial organisms are usually implicated in deep infection. We used the microbiological profile of infected Gustilo IIIB tibial fractures to define a new, dynamic prophylactic regimen which recognises the need for prophylaxis against nosocomial organisms at the time of definitive closure. METHODS: The microbiological profiles of Gustilo IIIB tibial fractures presenting over a 2-year period from January 2006 to December 2007 were reviewed. The environmental contaminants were compared with the organisms isolated from deep SSI's and correlated with the prophylactic antibiotic regimen used. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included. Nine developed a deep tissue infection. The pathogens implicated included resistant Enterococci, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter and MRSA. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis provided cover for these combinations in only one of nine cases. This would have improved to eight of nine cases with the use of teicoplanin and gentamicin, given as a one-time dose during definitive soft-tissue closure. Specimens taken from wound debridement were neither sensitive nor specific for the subsequent development of deep infection and did not predict the organisms responsible. CONCLUSIONS: Following high-energy open fracture, a single prophylactic antibiotic regimen directed against environmental wound contaminants does not provide cover for the organisms responsible for deepest SSI's and may have depopulated the niche, promoting nosocomial contamination prior to definitive closure. We advocate a dynamic prophylactic strategy, tailoring a second wave of prophylaxis against nosocomial organisms at the time of definitive wound closure, and at the same time avoiding the potential complications of prolonged antibiotic use.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.bjps.2010.05.037

Type

Journal article

Journal

J plast reconstr aesthet surg

Publication Date

03/2011

Volume

64

Pages

375 - 380

Keywords

Adult, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Surgical Wound Infection, Tibial Fractures