Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a significant part of the workload in plastic surgery. There are currently wide variations in the available resource for dealing with these patients. Delays to treatment currently exist and may result in poorer clinical outcomes. METHOD: Data was collected prospectively in 4 centres (Cork University Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Stoke Mandeville Hospital and Salisbury District Hospital) assessing delays to theatre. We assessed time to theatre, both from injury and from review, cancellation rate, starvation time and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 424 patients were audited over an 8-week period. The average time from review to theatre was 15.7 h and the average injury-to-theatre time was 58.6 h. The average starvation time was 10 h; the mean cancellation rate was 25%. Patients are satisfied overall with the service provided with 83% rating the service as excellent or good, and 63% feeling that there wait was not too long. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in provision of emergency plastic surgery trauma lists, the average wait for emergency plastic surgery is increasing. Despite this patients remain, on the whole, satisfied with the service that they are receiving.

Original publication




Journal article


J plast reconstr aesthet surg

Publication Date





873 - 877


Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Treatment, Female, Humans, Injury Severity Score, Male, Medical Audit, Prospective Studies, Surgery, Plastic, Time Factors, United Kingdom, Waiting Lists, Workload, Wounds and Injuries