Grey literature and systematic reviews

Mallett S.; Hopewell S.; Clarke M.

Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Grey literature and systematic reviews

Mallett S., Hopewell S., Clarke M.

CHAPTER 4 Grey Literature and Systematic Reviews Sally Hopewell, Mike Clarke and Sue Mallett UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK KEY POINTS • The validity of a systematic review is highly dependent on the results of the underlying data.

Type

Chapter

Book title

Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Publication Date

05/12/2005

Total pages

356

Keywords

Medical