Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish and validate the measurement properties of the Disability Rating Index (DRI) in a population of adults undergoing hip replacement. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six adults participating in a randomized controlled trial completed the Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score, DRI and EuroQol Group-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires at four time points. The structural validity of the DRI was assessed using principal component analysis. Cronbach's α was used to determine the internal consistency and scale reliability was also assessed. Correlation between the DRI and the other functional and health-related quality of life scales was used to check criterion validity. DRI responsiveness was estimated and the interpretability of the scale was also assessed by checking for edge effects. RESULTS: Results of analyses showed that the DRI was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.92), had good association with both function-specific and general health-related quality of life scores and was sensitive to change (smallest detectable change = 2.7). No evidence of edge effects was found. Furthermore, structural assessment of the DRI revealed two novel subscales representing simple tasks and difficult tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The DRI is structurally valid, responsive and concurs with functional assessment in adults undergoing hip replacement.

Original publication




Journal article


Rheumatology (oxford)

Publication Date





64 - 71


DRI, disability evaluation, patient reported outcomes, validity, Adult, Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome