Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We report outcomes on 120 Birmingham Hip Resurfacings (BHRs) (mean age 50 years) at a minimum of ten-years follow-up. Cases were performed by one surgeon and included his learning curve. Six hips were revised, with no revisions for infection, dislocation, or adverse reaction to metal debris. Ten-year survival was 94.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 88.8%-98.7%) for all revisions and 96.1% (95% CI 91.5%-99.8%) for revisions for aseptic loosening. Gender (P = 0.463) and head size (P = 0.114) did not affect revision risk. Mean post-operative Harris hip score was 84.0. Contrary to previous independent reports, good outcomes into the second decade were achieved with the BHR in both men and women. Longer term follow-up will confirm whether these promising outcomes in women continue.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.042

Type

Journal article

Journal

J arthroplasty

Publication Date

07/2015

Volume

30

Pages

1160 - 1166

Keywords

hip resurfacing, metal-on-metal, outcomes, revision surgery, survival, Adult, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hip, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Learning Curve, Male, Metals, Middle Aged, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome