Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Our aim, using English Hospital Episode Statistics data before during and after the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT), was to assess whether the results of the trial affected clinical practice.Data were grouped into six month intervals from July 2005 to December 2014. All patient episodes in the National Health Service involving emergency surgery for an isolated distal radial fracture were included.Clinical practice in England had not changed in the five years before DRAFFT: 75% of patients were treated with plate fixation versus 12% with Kirschner (K)-wires. After the publication of the trial, the proportion of patients having K-wire fixation rose to 42% with a concurrent fall in the proportion having fixation with a plate to 48%. The proportion of 'other' procedures stayed the same.It appears that surgeons in the United Kingdom do change their practice in response to large, pragmatic, multicentre clinical trials in musculoskeletal trauma.

Original publication

DOI

10.1302/0301-620x.98b3.36730

Type

Journal article

Journal

The bone & joint journal

Publication Date

03/2016

Volume

98-B

Pages

410 - 413

Addresses

The Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Radius Fractures, Wrist Injuries, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Bone Plates, Bone Wires, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Services Research, Professional Practice, England, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic