Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We have assessed the relative value of various outcome measures after THR, by the analysis of follow-up data from over 2000 patients. They had been reviewed clinically and radiologically six months after operation, at one year, and then every two years, some for 16 years. At each review their pain level, stiffness and opinion of progress were scored and a radiograph taken. We found that pain level was the most informative outcome as a predictor of revision and correlated well with the patients' opinions. We made a comparison between the six types of implant in the series, using survival analysis and log-rank testing with different pain levels as endpoints. This analysis revealed differences which were not detected by survival analysis using the traditional endpoint of revision. We therefore recommend the use of different levels of pain as the main outcome measures after total hip replacement.

Original publication

DOI

10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6572

Type

Journal article

Journal

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume

Publication Date

01/1997

Volume

79

Pages

93 - 98

Addresses

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, Headington, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Pain Measurement, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Prosthesis, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Female, Male