Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Systemic vasculitides are a group of heterogeneous conditions with overlapping patterns of clinical and laboratory manifestations. Moreover, clinical features can be non-specific and seemingly disparate. A major factor in defining optimal therapy and measuring treatment response is careful disease assessment targeting four main domains: activity, damage, prognosis and quality of life/function. Assessment tools such as the Birmingham Activity Score and the Vasculitis Damage Index have become a core feature of clinical trials in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and formed the basis for sound clinical management of these complex conditions. We are still lacking accurate definitions of disease activity and damage progression in large-vessel vasculitis. There is an increasing interest in the role of patient-reported outcomes as a measure of disease impact; a disease-specific measure for use in AAV is being validated. We review how best to evaluate patients with large-, medium- and small-vessel vasculitis.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.berh.2018.10.001

Type

Journal article

Journal

Best pract res clin rheumatol

Publication Date

02/2018

Volume

32

Pages

31 - 51

Keywords

ANCA-Associated vasculitis, Damage, Disease activity, Disease assessment, Giant cell arteritis, Patient-reported outcomes, Prognosis, Quality of life, Takayasu arteritis, Vasculitis, Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Disease Progression, Humans, Prognosis, Quality of Life