Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Outcome measurement is a key part of study design but presents particular challenges in spondyloarthropathy. Enthesitis and dactylitis are typical features of spondyloarthropathy and validated scoring systems for both are available, although the majority of enthesitis outcome measures are validated in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) only. Assessment of axial disease is well researched in AS and composite outcome measures are routinely used. However, assessment of axial disease in predominantly peripheral arthritis, such as psoriatic arthritis, is problematic and under-researched. Extensive research in dermatology has provided multiple outcome measures for skin psoriasis. The psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) remains the most common outcome measure used, despite the fact that significant problems exist with this scale and that newer scoring methods and modifications of the PASI show better validity. Nail psoriasis is accurately measured by detailed scoring systems but these can be time-consuming.

Original publication




Journal article


Best pract res clin rheumatol

Publication Date





659 - 670


Arthritis, Psoriatic, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Spondylitis, Ankylosing