Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We studied the migration of 58 cemented Hinek femoral components for total hip replacement, using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis over four years. The implants migrated faster during the first year than subsequently, and the pattern of migration in the second period was very different. During the first year they subsided, tilted into varus and internally rotated. After this there was slow distal migration with no change in orientation. None of the prostheses has yet failed. The early migration is probably caused by resorption of bone damaged by surgical trauma or the heat generated by the polymerisation of bone cement. Later migration may be due to creep in the bone cement or the surrounding fibrous membrane. The prosthesis which we studied allows the preservation of some of the femoral neck, and comparison with published migration studies of the Charnley stem suggests that this decreases rotation and may help to prevent loosening.


Journal article


J bone joint surg br

Publication Date





796 - 801


Adult, Aged, Bone Cements, Bone Resorption, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Photogrammetry, Predictive Value of Tests, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Radiography, Reproducibility of Results, Rotation, Time Factors