Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: The two main treatment options for end stage single compartment knee arthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We compared the long term outcomes in different age groups. METHODS: 54,215 UKRs and 54,215 TKRs from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics database were propensity score matched and Kaplan-Meier and regression analysis used to compare revision, reoperation, mortality and three month complications. RESULTS: UKR had higher 10 year (yr) revision rates (12% versus 5%, Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.31, p<0.001) and 10 yr re-operation rates (25% versus 21%, HR 1.12, p<0.001). UKR had lower 10 yr mortality rates (13.6% versus 15.5%, HR of 0.86, p<0.001). UKR had lower rates of medical (p<0.001) and procedure related (p<0.001) complications and deaths (HR 0.61, p=0.02). If 100 patients had a UKR instead of a TKR then over 10 yrs, if they were <55 yr old there would be 7 more re-operations and 1 less death, 55-64 yr 6 more reoperations and 2 more deaths; 65-74 yr 4 more re-operations and 2 less deaths, and ≥75 yr 2 more re-operations and 4 less deaths. CONCLUSIONS: UKR have higher revision and slightly higher re-operation rates but lower mortality rates than matched TKR. The decision to do a UKR should, in part, be based on the balance of these risks, which are influenced by patient age. In the elderly group (>75 yr) the data suggests that UKR compared to TKR have a greater absolute reduction in mortality than the increase in re-operation rate.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.018

Type

Journal article

Journal

J arthroplasty

Publication Date

04/10/2021

Keywords

Age, Reoperation, Revision, Total knee replacement, Unicompartmental knee replacement