Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This study investigates potential selection bias in outcome prediction within the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) resulting from arbitrarily made decisions. In the processing of health data, decisions regarding cohort criteria and variable selection are often arbitrarily made, potentially introducing selection bias. This work explores if such decisions affect results of data analysis and potential conclusions of research studies. An experiment is conducted in which four arbitrary decisions are made. Results demonstrate significant differences in the obtained datasets and indicate a high potential for bias based on inclusion or exclusion decisions. The findings contribute to informed healthcare policies, better decision-making, and improved patient outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for testing assumptions and decisions in ongoing research that uses clinical data.

Original publication

DOI

10.1109/ICHI61247.2024.00038

Type

Conference paper

Publication Date

01/01/2024

Pages

234 - 241