Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To further assess the construct validity of the three European Scleroderma Study Group (EScSG) preliminary activity indices for systemic sclerosis (SSc): for SSc as a whole, for diffuse SSc (dcSSc), and for limited SSc (lcSSc). METHODS: 30/290 SSc clinical charts collected for the EScSG study used to develop activity criteria for SSc were selected and sent to four clinical experts in SSc. The experts ranked the charts from 1 to 30 (1=lowest activity, 30=highest activity). The relationships among the ranks given by each investigator and each of the three scores, and between any two of the ranks were investigated. RESULTS: A consistently significant correlation (r(s)=0.530-0.712) was found between the ranks given by each of the four investigators and the index for the entire patient group. A similar level of agreement was detected between each couple of the four experts (r(s)=0.428-0.720). Moreover, the ranks given in patients with an index >3 were significantly higher than those given for patients with an index < or =3. This cut off point had previously been shown to best discriminate patients with active disease. CONCLUSIONS: Of the originally developed activity indexes, the whole series index has been externally validated. The index comprises the first preliminary, but necessary, groundwork to improve the concept of disease activity in SSc, which is still ill defined. It can be used as a preliminary activity index in clinical investigational studies.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/ard.62.9.901

Type

Journal article

Journal

Annals of the rheumatic diseases

Publication Date

09/2003

Volume

62

Pages

901 - 903

Addresses

U.O. di Reumatologia, Second University of Naples, Italy. gabriele.valentini@unina2.it

Keywords

Humans, Scleroderma, Systemic, Observer Variation, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results