Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Identifying pain as coming from the hip joint is more complex than for other large joint sites. There is no accepted best approach to defining hip pain for use in clinical and epidemiological studies.To compare the use of verbal and pictorial descriptions in ascertaining hip pain.A cross sectional population based study on 2935 subjects compared groups reporting hip pain either using a pain diagram, or answering a question specifically asking about hip pain. The groups were compared with a group reporting no pain for various clinical indices of hip disease, including limitation of range of movement and evidence of radiographic change.Subjects who satisfied both criteria for hip pain were substantially more likely to have used analgesics, consulted a physician, or had walking difficulty. Differences in range of movement were less clear cut but radiographic damage was more evident in those with both criteria.Subjects whose pain satisfies both a pictorial and a verbal definition (where the patient uses the word "hip") have the strongest relation to indicators of hip disease. This approach is recommended when a specific definition is required for ascertaining individuals for study.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/ard.2003.018788

Type

Journal article

Journal

Annals of the rheumatic diseases

Publication Date

01/2005

Volume

64

Pages

95 - 98

Addresses

ARC Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Pain, Analgesics, Radiography, Pain Measurement, Range of Motion, Articular, Walking, Cross-Sectional Studies, Medical Illustration, Audiovisual Aids, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires