Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions.

Domenghino A. et al, (2023), Nat med, 29, 811 - 822

Identification of implant outliers in joint replacement registries.

de Steiger RN. et al, (2023), Efort open rev, 8, 11 - 17

Registry stakeholders.

Lübbeke A. et al, (2019), Efort open rev, 4, 330 - 336

The paradox of self-rated health following joint replacement surgery.

Perneger T. and Lübbeke A., (2019), Qual life res, 28, 503 - 508

Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe.

Lübbeke A. et al, (2018), Health policy, 122, 548 - 557

Research methodology for orthopaedic surgeons, with a focus on outcome.

Lübbeke A., (2018), Efort open rev, 3, 160 - 167

International variation in shoulder arthroplasty.

Lübbeke A. et al, (2017), Acta orthop, 88, 592 - 599

Load More