Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Mohammad HR. et al, (2020), Acta orthop, 91, 420 - 425

Does Regional Anesthesia Reduce Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Replacement Compared With General Anesthesia? An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Matharu GS. et al, (2020), J arthroplasty, 35, 1521 - 1528.e5

The effect of smoking on outcomes following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a population-based cohort study of 117,024 patients.

Matharu GS. et al, (2019), Acta orthop, 90, 559 - 567

Has the threshold for revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris changed in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? A cohort study using an adapted risk stratification algorithm.

Matharu G. et al, (2019), Acta orthopaedica

How variable are hip replacement implant costs across the National Health Service?

Matharu G. et al, (2019), The journal of trauma and orthopeadics

Do Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Rerevision After Revision THA Performed for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Study Using the NJR Data Set.

Matharu GS. et al, (2019), Clin orthop relat res, 477, 1382 - 1389

No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions.

Matharu GS. et al, (2019), J arthroplasty

Letter to the Editor on "Indications for MARS-MRI in Patients Treated With Articular Surface Replacement XL Total Hip Arthroplasty".

Matharu GS., (2019), J arthroplasty, 34, 605 - 606

Letter to the Editor: Is There a Cardiotoxicity Associated With Metallic Head Hip Prostheses? A Cohort Study in the French National Health Insurance Databases.

Matharu GS. and Whitehouse MR., (2018), Clin orthop relat res, 476, 2459 - 2461

Do Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Rerevision After Revision THA Performed for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Study Using the NJR Data Set.

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), Clin orthop relat res

Age and Outcomes of Medial Meniscal-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Kennedy JA. et al, (2018), J arthroplasty, 33, 3153 - 3159

Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), J bone joint surg am, 100, 1132 - 1140

Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), Acta orthop, 89, 278 - 288

Implant failure in bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties: a clinical and pathological study.

Uchihara Y. et al, (2018), J mater sci mater med, 29

Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified?

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), Bmj, 360

Metal-on-metal hips: current status

Ansari JS. et al, (2018), Orthopaedics and trauma, 32, 54 - 60

Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), Clin orthop relat res, 476, 245 - 258

Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), J arthroplasty, 33, 447 - 452

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), Acta orthop, 89, 29 - 39

Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Matharu GS. et al, (2018), Bone joint j, 100-B, 33 - 41

Load More

Include forthcoming?