Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: To assess patient expectation, visual improvement, and patient satisfaction after macular hole surgery. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients completed a self-administered questionnaire after macular hole surgery. Responses for expectation of visual improvement before surgery and subjective visual assessment after surgery were scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no improvement in vision, 10 = full improvement). Visual acuity was measured using Snellen charts and converted to logMAR equivalent for statistical analysis. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed using the Minitab statistical software program; p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (71%) patients were satisfied with the outcome, 14 (26%) were not, and 1 was uncertain. Both satisfied and dissatisfied patients had no difference in baseline preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; 6/60 and 6/60, respectively). There was also no significant difference in median postoperative BCVA between both groups (6/24 and 6/29, respectively, p = 0.6). In satisfied patients, median vision expectation score of 6 was equally similar to the median subjective postoperative vision improvement score of 6, p = 0.7. However, in dissatisfied patients, median vision expectation score (8) was significantly higher than median postoperative subjective vision improvement score (1), p = 0.0001. The commonest reason for dissatisfaction was perceived visual reduction (7/14 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In the dissatisfied patients, expectation was significantly higher, and subjective assessment of vision after surgery was lower than in satisfied patients, although they had similar improvement in BCVA. Visual acuity and patient satisfaction are not always directly correlated. An important factor in patient satisfaction is expectation.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/opx.0b013e3182058fc0

Type

Journal article

Journal

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry

Publication Date

02/2011

Volume

88

Pages

312 - 316

Addresses

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Keywords

Humans, Retinal Perforations, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Period, Questionnaires, Prospective Studies, Eyeglasses, Visual Acuity, Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Female, Male