Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: To explore thresholds for the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Impact of Disease questionnaire (PsAID12) score against disease activity measures in an observational setting, in patients with PsA. METHODS: The baseline data from the ReFlaP observational, prospective, multicentre and international study was used (NCT03119805). Cutoffs for PsAID12 were determined against disease activity scores, defining disease impact states (ie remission, low impact, moderate impact and high impact). Statistics used to assess the optimal cutoff point included the Youden's index and the 75th percentile method, with external anchors (i.e. DAPSA, VDLA/MDA and single questions for both patients and physicians) serving as gold standards. The diagnostic performance of these cutoffs was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients were analyzed. Mean (standard deviation, SD) PsAID12 score was 3.4 (SD 2.5). The prevalence of remission varied between 12.4% and 36.1%, while low disease activity ranged from 37.8% to 59.8%. PsAID12 performed well against external anchors, with high areas under the ROC curves ranging from 0.75-0.94. Using the DAPSA as external anchor, the proposed PsAID12 cutoffs were <1.7 for remission, ≥1.7 to ≤ 3.1 for low impact, >3.1 to 

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/rheumatology/keaf002

Type

Journal

Rheumatology (oxford)

Publication Date

03/01/2025

Keywords

PsAID12, Psoriatic Arthritis, patient reported outcomes