Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

INTRODUCTION: Severe open lower limb fractures are complex and costly injuries. Studies reporting the costs associated with these injuries, the economic impact of complications, and the clinical benefit of adherence to national guidelines have been previously reported. However, the economic benefits of national guidelines and their relationship with length of inpatient stay have not been described. METHODS: An international retrospective cohort study, using length of stay as a proxy for in-hospital economic impact, comparing the duration of inpatient stay in countries with national guidelines and those without. RESULTS: In a cohort of 2641 patients from 16 countries, length of stay was 17 % lower in countries with national guidelines, equivalent to 2-3 fewer inpatient days per patient. This difference was primarily driven by a lower incidence of deep infection observed in countries with national clinical guidelines. CONCLUSION: The presence of national guidelines for the management of severe lower limb injuries is associated with both improved clinical outcomes and reduced length of stay and therefore healthcare burden. Whilst application and adoption of national guidelines is not without challenges, their implementation is associated with significant clinical and economic benefits.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.injury.2025.112178

Type

Journal

Injury

Publication Date

21/01/2025

Volume

56

Keywords

Clinical guideline, Open fracture, Tibial fracture