Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) and explore variation by age and gender. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a lifetime cohort Markov model. SETTING: National population registry data. PARTICIPANTS: Model parameters were informed by propensity score-matched comparisons of TSA and HA in patients with osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff using data from the National Joint Registry. INTERVENTIONS: TSA and HA. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs for age and gender subgroups. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: In all subgroups, TSA was more cost-effective, with the probability of being cost-effective about 70% for TSA versus 30% for HA at any willingness-to-pay threshold above £1100 per QALY. TSA was dominant in young patients (≤60 years) with a mean cost saving of £463 in men and £658 in women, and a mean QALY gain of 2 in both men and women. In patients aged 61-75 years, there was a mean cost saving following HA of £395 in men and £181 in women, while QALYs remained superior following TSA with a 1.3 gain in men and 1.4 in women. In the older cohort (> 75 years), the cost difference was highest and the QALY difference was lowest; there was a cost-saving following HA of £905 in men and £966 in women. The mean QALY gain remained larger after TSA: 0.7 in men and 0.9 in women. CONCLUSION: TSA was more cost-effective than HA in patients with osteoarthritis. QALYs were superior following TSA in all patient groups. Cost differences varied by age and TSA was dominant in young patients.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086150

Type

Journal

Bmj open

Publication Date

18/03/2025

Volume

15

Keywords

Elbow & shoulder, Health economics, ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY, Patients, Shoulder, Humans, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Male, Female, Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder, Middle Aged, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Registries, Hemiarthroplasty, Osteoarthritis, Markov Chains, Health Care Costs, United Kingdom, Propensity Score, Age Factors