Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:245-7.

Original publication

DOI

10.1302/2046-3758.211.2000224

Type

Journal article

Journal

Bone & joint research

Publication Date

01/2013

Volume

2

Pages

245 - 247

Addresses

Warwick Medical School, Clinical SciencesBuilding, Warwick University, CliffordBridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.