Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

© ESSKA 2015. Validation is a very important, but not the sole criterion based upon which simulators should be evaluated. In this chapter, we propose three sets of evaluation criteria to assess the appropriateness of simulators to train arthroscopic skills: Wishes from the arthroscopic community (Chap.2), general requirements for medical simulators and validation (Chap.8). The first two sets of criteria are elucidated in the remainder of this section; the latter is fully covered inChap.​ 8.For the simulators presented inChaps.5,6, and7, we evaluate to what extent they fulfil these three sets of criteria. This will be done using a 3-point Likert scale: + implies the simulator completely fulfils a requirement, ~ implies that the simulator fulfils a requirement to some extent and – implies that the simulator does not fulfil a requirement. Whenever possible, the evaluation is performed per type of simulator, for example, high-fidelity virtual reality simulators or box trainers.

Original publication





Book title

Effective Training of Arthroscopic Skills

Publication Date



95 - 115