Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

INTRODUCTION: Reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA) can be performed using a Deltopectoral (DP) or alternatively a Transdeltoid (TD) approach. HYPOTHESIS: Although the humeral cut is lower by TD approach, this should not affect postoperative functional results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study evaluated the complete medical records of RSA implanted between October 2003 and December 2008. Inclusion criteria were: follow-up of at least 1 year, a complete file including a comparative radiological work-up making it possible to analyze eventual arm and humeral lengthening. Evaluation of postoperative function was based on Active Anterior Elevation (AAE). RESULTS: We studied 144 RSA in 142 patients. One hundred and nine RSA were implanted by the DP approach and 35 by the TD approach. Mean lengthening of the humerus compared to the controlateral side by DP approach was 0.5±1.3 cm while there was a mean shortening of -0.5±1.0 cm by TD approach (P<0.001). The difference in cut was partially compensated by using thicker polyethylene inserts with the TD approach. Mean arm lengthening compared to the controlateral side was 1.7±1.7 cm by DP approach and 1.2±1.4 cm by TD approach (mean difference 0.5 cm; (95% CI -0.1; 1.2). AAE for RSA by DP approach was 145±22° and 135±29° by TD approach (mean difference 10°, 95% CI -1; 21). DISCUSSION: RSA results in improved AAE because of restored deltoid tension and an increase in the deltoid lever arm. The humeral cut by TD is lower, but this was partially corrected in this study by the use of thicker polyethylene inserts. Nevertheless there is no significant clinical difference in postoperative function between the two approaches.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.otsr.2011.04.008

Type

Journal article

Journal

Orthop traumatol surg res

Publication Date

10/2011

Volume

97

Pages

579 - 582

Keywords

Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Female, Humans, Male, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies, Shoulder Joint, Treatment Outcome