Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection is difficult, but crucial for appropriate treatment. Scintigraphy with specific markers for infection (labelled white cells or immunoglobulin-G) has been reported as a more reliable diagnostic tool than clinical assessment (fever, fistula), laboratory studies (polynuclear neutrophil count, erythrocyte rate sedimentation, and C-reactive protein), and preoperative aspiration. In the first part of this study, we retrospectively reviewed 230 patients admitted with a suspected prosthetic joint infection, and examined the validity of the different diagnostic tools for the group as a whole and for subgroups according to the Coventry classification. In the second part, we reviewed 35 articles about preoperative evaluation of infection in prosthetic joints and compared them to our findings. Our study indicates that C-reactive protein and joint aspiration are the most useful tools to diagnose prosthetic joint infection even in situations of chronic infection (Coventry type II).

Original publication

DOI

10.1080/00365540410015240

Type

Journal article

Journal

Scand j infect dis

Publication Date

2004

Volume

36

Pages

410 - 416

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, C-Reactive Protein, Cohort Studies, Female, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Preoperative Care, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Suction