Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AIMS: In rodent and primate studies, urotensin II is an extremely potent vasoconstrictor peptide with effects in the central aortic and arterial vasculature as well as on cardiac function. The aim of the present study was to assess systemic haemodynamic responses to intravenous urotensin II infusion in humans. METHODS: In 10 healthy male volunteers, intravenous urotensin II (3, 30 and 300 pmol min-1) and saline placebo were given on separate occasions in a single-blind randomized manner. Systemic haemodynamics and arterial stiffness were assessed by sphygmomanometry, transthoracic bioimpedance, and pulse wave analysis. Plasma urotensin II immuno-reactivity was measured by radio-immunoassay. RESULTS: Intravenous urotensin II infusions were well tolerated with no adverse clinical effects and no electrocardiographic changes. Circulating plasma urotensin II immuno-reactivity increased from baseline of 16 +/- 1 to 1460 +/- 82 pmol l-1 (mean +/- s.e. mean) during infusion of urotensin II at 300 pmol min-1 (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant placebo adjusted changes in heart rate (95% confidence intervals: -3.6, + 4.4 min-1), mean arterial pressure (-5.8, + 1.7 mmHg) or cardiac index (-0.1, + 0.4 l min-1 m-2). There were also no changes in augmentation index (-4.1, + 5.2%) or pulse wave velocity (-1.3, + 0.3 m s-1). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous urotensin II infusion did not affect systemic haemodynamics or arterial stiffness, despite achieving an approximately 100-fold increase in plasma immuno-reactivity. We conclude that urotensin II is unlikely to have a physiological role in the short term regulation of vascular tone or blood pressure in man. Further confirmatory studies with urotensin II receptor antagonists are required.

Original publication




Journal article


Br j clin pharmacol

Publication Date





617 - 621


Adult, Blood Pressure, Cardiac Output, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Hemodynamics, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Single-Blind Method, Urotensins, Vascular Resistance, Vasoconstrictor Agents