Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fracture is an important complication of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. The press fit between the keel and the bone's keel slot is responsible for primary fixation and also contributes to fracture risk. This study investigates whether the fracture risk could be reduced without compromising primary fixation, by using different instruments to widen the keel slot. METHODS: Keel slots were made in polyurethane blocks (n = 60) using the standard keel cut saw blade or a new blade that was 0.2 mm wider, with adjuvant use of the cemented pick or a prototype rasp. A tibial component was pushed into and pulled out of the slots using a Dartec materials testing machine. It was assumed that the 'push-in' force was related to the risk of fracture and 'pull-out' force was related to fixation. Reproducibility studies with 10 different tibial components were undertaken. RESULTS: The new blade required significantly lower push-in forces than the standard blade (789 N SD 130, 1411 N SD 180; P < 0.001), but the pull-out forces were not different (240 N SD 47, 230 N SD 56; P > 0.999). With the standard blade the pick decreased the push-in (818 N SD 318; P < 0.001) and pull-out (128 N SD 58; P < 0.001) forces, but the rasp had no effect. With the new blade the pick had no effect, but the rasp increased the push-in force (1390 N SD 202; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the fracture risk will be reduced with the new blades, with no compromise in fixation. If the new blades are used routine use of the cemented pick appears to be of no benefit.

Original publication




Journal article



Publication Date





988 - 996


Fixation, Fracture, Interference, Unicompartmental knee replacement, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Bone Cements, Humans, Knee Prosthesis, Models, Anatomic, Polyurethanes, Prosthesis Design, Reproducibility of Results, Tibia, Tibial Fractures